Officials Respond: What the New 'Last Resort' Sales Tax Means for Oak Forest

Mayor Hank Kuspa and aldermen share their thoughts on why a 1 percent sales tax increase is needed, and what the money could mean for the city.

Shopping in Oak Forest got a bit more expensive Tuesday night, as the voted 5–0 in favor of a 1 percent home-rules sales tax increase. The increase will go into effect July 1 and will apply to tangible personal items, excluding nonprepared food, medicine and automobiles.

The tax was implemented to help the city recover from a $4.2 shortfall in income, sales and utility tax revenue over the past four years. Administrators previously reported the city has cut full-time staff by 12 percent and part-time by 50 percent, along with delaying the purchase of vehicles and equipment within the city. 

"This is the last resort, I think we all know," Julian said. "After three years, we have been battling declining revenues, increasing expenses … we have made every effort to live within the revenues that we have, to the point that we're no longer going to be able to sustain the current services that are provided."

The new tax could bring in $1.1 million, which officials say would enable the city to fill five full-time positions, with the remaining money earmarked for capital improvements.

The tax has been a hot button issue with residents in previous days, although alderwoman Laura Clemons said she spoke with several residents who were swayed in favor of the tax after learning what it could mean for the city.


"I think it's just an education thing," she said. "So when I explain to a resident, 'When you're shopping in Country Club Hills at Walmart, you're contributing a point and a quarter to their roads, to their police, to their budgets, to their bottom lines,' and they're like 'Really?' I tell them yes.

"My hope is [people will shop in Oak Forest]," she continued. "Call it my community spirit or call it what you will, if a resident leaves our town and goes to shop in Tinley ... they're giving us nothing. It's going to have a detrimental effect in the long run."

Mayor Hank Kuspa spoke at length about the need for the tax.

Kuspa said that the tax was "extremely difficult," to pass and that without it, property taxes would have gone up 15 percent. The new tax, he said, is a better alternative.

"People from outside our community, who come to our stores, we have an opportunity to try to generate some revenue for the city and not only taxing our residents," Kuspa said. "Because property taxes only tax our residents. I just didn't want to go that route."

Although the tax will go into effect July 1, the city will not see the money until at least October of this year, according to City Treasurer Dwayne Fox.

Kuspa added that although more could be cut from the budget, he was unwilling to reduce public services any further. With four employees per 1,000 residents, the city currently operates at roughly 60 percent of the total of 50 neighboring municipalities, according to documents provided by Julian. 

"There's more to cut. Yes—there's more to cut, but at what expense," Kuspa said. "The aldermen and I have made a decision to not cut city services any more. ... We are not laying off anyone else, expect through attrition. Our work force is reducing. The council decided we are not reducing city services to the residents any more."

Want the latest on government news in Oak Forest? Sign up for our daily newsletter. 

How did

chuck toland April 02, 2012 at 09:20 PM
The last couple of years the non-union city employees have taken a 10% wage reductiion through furlough days and no wage increases in 3-years. Please feel free to call me with any questions regarding these facts. I am happy to provide anything to you. I have sent out thousands of emails regarding budget meetings and one resident showed up to one meeting. The fact is the levy should have been about 15% for the last 3-years, and the water minimum usage fee shoud have been $20, not $15. We tried to keep the rates as low as possible with the residents in mind, but the city can no longer cut anything. I would be happy to go over the budget line by line with anyone. This was a really hard decision, and I feel for the residents. Give me a call at 708-671-5400 during the day, and I can go over anything you want.
chuck toland April 02, 2012 at 09:30 PM
I forgot to mention that the union employees made concessions as well, and it was greatly appreciated.
Michael M. April 25, 2012 at 03:34 AM
Maybe the tax would not have been needed if the city was not using tax payer dollars to pay for facade improvements for businesses in Oak Forest.
David B April 25, 2012 at 01:18 PM
@ McCarthy,,it was a typo, should be 2,869,257
mary anne zeug May 10, 2012 at 02:25 PM
i see a decline in oak forest we are in a recession we dont need a higher tax on food the elected officials have done nothing to get better business here shop oak forest for WHAT there is no target no walmart nothing for the average family to buy here in our city other cities have done a better job of luring and snagging business to come to our area and because there our no good stores our revenue has fallen and will fall and our services will decline crime is here vandals are here but this is a good area and the families and people here need to be helped and supported


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »